物流績效指數

142

(Logistics Performance Index)

2009 11 APEC APEC APEC

(

(Logistics Performance Index,LPI) 2010 ) 1,000 1 5 1

5

2007 2009 (Turku School of Economics (TSE)) 5,000 155 LPI

(LPI)

5. 6.

)

) UPS LPI (International LPI) (Domestic LPI)

(

(

(

))

(

) (Level of Fees and Charges)

(Customs) competence) (Timeliness)

(Infrastructure) (Logistics (Tracking & tracing)

(Competence and Quality of Services) (Sources of Major Delays) 2005) (Efficiency of Processes) 2005

(Quality of Infrastructure)

(International shipments)

(Changes in the Logistics Environment Since

130

1,000

(

2007

25%) )

(LPI Survey)

(

1. 2. ) 3. 4. ( (

LPI Survey 2009



142

(1) 2005

6

( ( )

(2)

8

8

7

6

(4) 8 (8 ) ( a. )

7

(Efficiency of the clearance process )( )

(5) b.

of formalities by border control agencies) and transport related infrastructure)( ) c.

(p r e d i c t a b i l i t y

(Q u a l i t y o f t r a d e

priced shipments) ( f.

(Ease of arranging competitively d. (a u t o m a t e d r i s k

(Competence and quality of logistics services) (Ability to track and trace consignments) ) e.

assessment) Yes No N/A

2005

Do not know

4

(Inspector discretion)

is it easier or more complicated to comply with the cargo security requirements (i.e. screening, advance information)when arranging shipments to:) (reach the consignee ( g. 155 ( )

(Compared to the situation in year 2005,

within the scheduled or expected delivery time) ) (

7

)

6 tionnaire.pdf

(3)

INTTLF/Resources/Logistics_Performance_2009_Ques

http://siteresources.worldbank.org/