Difference Strategies for Solving Conflict

a. Value Analysis Strategy

The value analysis strategy was introduced by J.R. Franenkel and Coomb in 1980. The purpose of this strategy is to resolve the dilemma problem of moral conflict. It consists of 2 approaches, that is Fraenkel Approach and Coomb Approach. In between of these approaches, they share of one common value. They both deal with conflicts analytical by identifying beforehand the value elements and facts. The action taken is always based on the study of pros and cons to the fact. This leads to the required of rational and logical thinking before making any value judgement. When having analysis, one is required to study the effect or consequences that are likely to happen, consider of feeling and welfare of people in conflict. Usually, complex conflict such as involve of facts, people and moral values can be analysed through this strategy. This is because it is more concerned on the moral dimension of moral reasoning whereas moral emotion and moral behaviour is neglected when in resolving the conflict.

B. Fraenkel Approach

The Fraenkel approach is dealing of conflicts by concerning social, personal, interpersonal and intergroup dilemma. Through the conflict, an alternative action is made and taken from the choices to resolve the conflict. From each alternative action, the effects and consequences which might be likely happened is put into the account in order to choose for the best action. Results, evidences and proofs are obtained from those effects before making any judgement. The criteria of each result are being considerate by the time the final decision is afterward announced to resolve the conflicts.

C. Comb Approach

The Coomb approach is a strategy to really deal with the conflict and lastly test on the present of moral principle. Conflict has been identified and how is the real situation happened is survey. The identification through the values in conflict between responsibility and justice is being recognized by Coomb approach....