Submitted by: Submitted by rossmorgan
Views: 747
Words: 536
Pages: 3
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 02/28/2011 06:24 PM
Coopers Case
* Facts
* Cooper Industries
* Manufacturer of heavy machinery and equipment
* 50’s- leading producer of engines and massive compressors used to force natural gas through pipelines and out of oil wells
* Cooper Industry Risk
* Heavy reliance on oil and gas industries for sales
* Cyclical nature of equipment sales
* Acquisitions ’59-’66:
* Supplier of portable industrial power tools
* Small manufacturer of industrial air compressors
* Small manufacturer of pumps for oil field applications
* Producer of tire changing tools for auto market
* Acquisition Requirements ’66+
* Industry in which Cooper could become major player
* Industry should be fairly stable, with a broad market, for the products and a product line of “small ticket” items.
* Acquisitions ’67; Lufkin Rule Company
* Largest manufacturer of measuring rules and tapes
* Quality product line with established distribution system of 35,000 hardware stores in US, Canada, and Mexico
* Management Integrations
* William Rector and Hal Stevens
* Knowledgeable about hand tool business
* Goal – Synergies:
* Build a hand tool company with full product line
* Use common sales and distributions system
* Also, they would use joint advertisement
* Lufkin needed Coopers financial strength
* Acquisition ’69: Crescent Niagara Corporation
* Demonstrated profitability in the early 60’s, but suffered under recent years under the mismanagement of some investor entrepreneurs who gained control in ’63.
* Cooper eager to add Crescent’s known and high-quality product line: wrenches, pliers, and screwdrivers.
* Clear that some of Crescent’s bad acquisitions and inefficient plants would have to be closed.
* Acquisition...