Intervention of the Government and Its Morality

In the question of law, it must be determined if it is thoughtful, right, or morally just for a government to set and defend rules to enhance self-development. In this essay, it can be shown that freedom and fairness must coincide, to encourage growth of a better society, and nourish an educated system. For a democratic society may allow its citizens to perform freely accordingly to their choices, known as personal liberty, but should cohere to appropriate law to preserve the democratic life. For the sanctity of each other’s personal liberty, shall the response of the law be morally appropriate to require people to develop the better self.

In a common democratic society, it is no question that freedom is available to its citizens and that personal liberty stands. However, personal liberty needs to be clearly defined before proceeding to discover what is morally acceptable for the law as limit. As a start, personal liberty is defined by the ability to make choices and sustain the freedom of actions without obligation on the actor’s part to behave in any specific way modeled by another party. One may conceive in acting out their choices with any intent desired freely without social values to void it unjust.

However, it is not the case for our society to behave in this manner. Although we may exercise the majority of our will, there are certain restrictions pertaining to what is acceptable in a shared environment; thusly we do have personal liberty but only to a certain extent. This is deemed positive liberty according to Isaiah Berlin. For it would be advantageous for the ruling power to provide a degree of freedom for whom they are governing, but not so much as resulting in individuals striving to capitalize through means of tyranny. Limitations on actions have to be set to prevent harm which may be caused due to inadequacy of controlling the people. For the preservation of a democratically ‘just’ society, or any society, is hinged on the survival...