Argument Essay of Animal Testing and Animal Rights

Related Essays

Argument Essay Random Drug Testing
ARGUMENT ESSAY RANDOM DRUG TESTING Drug abuse has always been a very delicate question as it always it deals with the health, well-being and even lives of
Argumentative Essay On Genetic Testing
it. I don't want to say what my way is the only way or the right way but if I'm given the wrong test, or a researcher decides to do his own thing and not follow
Argument Layout: Against Animal Testing
dogs). Rebuttal #1: for the "irreplaceable, foundation of medical advances" argument "Isn't animal testing responsible for every major medical advance?" Medical
Animal Rights/Testing
The biggest group that this animal rights organization focuses on is the abuse in laboratories. Some arguments for this animal testing is the benefits that come

Submitted by to the category English Composition on 06/04/2011 07:02 AM

Summary: Argument essay of animal testing and animal rights.


Comparison Essay: The Pain of Animals & Enemies of Science

For centuries scientists have used animals to study the causes of diseases; to test drugs, vaccines and surgical techniques; and to evaluate the safety of chemicals used in pesticides, cosmetics and other products. However, many scientists amongst animal- right activists forbid the use of animals in scientific research regardless how many illnesses are eliminated through the use of animals in scientific research. Amongst animal right activists, David Suzuki also raises concerns towards animal experimentation. In his article, The Pain of Animals, Suzuki argues that humans have no right to exploit animals because--much like humans--animals also experience pain. In contrast to Suzuki, Haldane, in his article, Some Enemies of Science, argues because animals are very similar to humans, scientists have no choice but to use animals in scientific experiments. Both authors greatly contrast their opinions towards animal experimentation; however Haldane has a more explanatory approach towards animal experimentation. He argues animal experimentation should be acceptable because other forms of animal exploitation are acceptable in society. Secondly, unlike other forms of exploitation which seek pleasure in killing animals such as leisure sport, scientists, most likely do not harm animals; if pain is intended on an animal it is strictly for the purpose of scientific advancement. Thirdly, although, animal experimentation may cause some extinction, it is only one of many other causes of extinction, if other causes are not condemned; then neither should animal experimentation. Most of all, those of who believe animal experimentation is wrong can chose not to purchase products that have been tested on animals. Overall, this essay will explain Haldane's his justification of using animals in scientific experimentation...

View Full Essay
Full Essay Stats...
  • Words: 1127
  • Pages: 5
  • Views: 2316

Join now to view this essay and thousands of others on It's free Join Now!