Argument Essay of Animal Testing and Animal Rights

Related Essays

Argument Essay Random Drug Testing
ARGUMENT ESSAY RANDOM DRUG TESTING Drug abuse has always been a very ... only logical that they have the right to know whether or not their employees are
Animal Testing - Is It Right To Take The Life Of An Innocent Animal?
is safe for humans. Is this right? Lab experimentation involving animals is inhumane. Animal testing is cruel because an animal s life is just as important as
Animal Testing - Do Animals Have Rights?
animal testing. In the process of animal testing, animals
Animal Testing - Should Animal Experimentation Be Permitted?
animal tests lead to pain on animals and a part of the tests are performed without any pain killers. Some tests lead to permanent injury or death. Animals

Submitted by to the category English Composition on 06/04/2011 07:02 AM

Summary: Argument essay of animal testing and animal rights.


Comparison Essay: The Pain of Animals & Enemies of Science

For centuries scientists have used animals to study the causes of diseases; to test drugs, vaccines and surgical techniques; and to evaluate the safety of chemicals used in pesticides, cosmetics and other products. However, many scientists amongst animal- right activists forbid the use of animals in scientific research regardless how many illnesses are eliminated through the use of animals in scientific research. Amongst animal right activists, David Suzuki also raises concerns towards animal experimentation. In his article, The Pain of Animals, Suzuki argues that humans have no right to exploit animals because--much like humans--animals also experience pain. In contrast to Suzuki, Haldane, in his article, Some Enemies of Science, argues because animals are very similar to humans, scientists have no choice but to use animals in scientific experiments. Both authors greatly contrast their opinions towards animal experimentation; however Haldane has a more explanatory approach towards animal experimentation. He argues animal experimentation should be acceptable because other forms of animal exploitation are acceptable in society. Secondly, unlike other forms of exploitation which seek pleasure in killing animals such as leisure sport, scientists, most likely do not harm animals; if pain is intended on an animal it is strictly for the purpose of scientific advancement. Thirdly, although, animal experimentation may cause some extinction, it is only one of many other causes of extinction, if other causes are not condemned; then neither should animal experimentation. Most of all, those of who believe animal experimentation is wrong can chose not to purchase products that have been tested on animals. Overall, this essay will explain Haldane's his justification of using animals in scientific experimentation...

View Full Essay
Full Essay Stats...
  • Words: 1127
  • Pages: 5
  • Views: 2335