Submitted by: Submitted by james0709
Views: 1063
Words: 325
Pages: 2
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 06/25/2011 04:55 AM
Financial Management: Principles and Applications
Week IV Team Assignment
Kristina Bury, Steven Leatherbury, Traci Russell, Jim Scanlon
Finance / 370
Derek Webster
June 20, 2011
12. Caledonia is considering two additional mutually exclusive projects. The cash flows associated with these projects are as follows:
YEAR PROJECT A PROJECT B
0 $100,000 $100,000
1 32,000 0
2 32,000 0
3 32,000 0
4 32,000 0
5 32,000 $200,000
The required rate of return on these projects is 11 percent.
See attached spreadsheet
a. What is each project’s payback period?
Project A- 100,000/32,000 = 3.125 years
Project B- 100,000/200,000 = 0.5 + 4 = 4.5 years
b. What is each project’s net present value?
Net Present Value Project A- $18,268.70
Net Present Value Project B- $18,690.27
c. What is each project’s internal rate of return?
Internal Rate of Return Project A- 18.03%
Internal Rate of Return Project B- 14.87%
d. What has caused the ranking conflict?
The conflicting rankings are caused by the reinvesting assumptions of the net present value (NPV) and the internal rate of returns (IRR). The NPV criteria assumes that cash flows over the life of the project can be reinvested at the required rate of return, and the IRR assumes the cash flows over the life of the project can be reinvested at the internal rate of return (Keown, Martin, & Petty, 2005.)
e. Which project should be accepted? Why?
Project B should be chosen because it has the largest net present value. This criterion has the best acceptable assumptions for the wealth of the shareholders. In the event that there is no capital rationing, the project with the highest NPV should be selected. (Keown, Martin, & Petty, 2005.)
References
Keown, A., Martin, J., & Petty, J. (2005). Financial Management: Principles and Applications. Retrieved from...