Rubrics

DLS-CSBSchool of management and information technology |

Documentation Rubric |

CAPROJ1FINAL ACADEMIC PROJECT |

|

BSBA-CA Degree Program |

|

This is a comprehensive document of the CAPROJ1 Rubric. The rubric grading system is explained here aided by examples to guide all parties concerned in the development of the Documented System Proposal required in the Final Academic Project (FAP). |

Contents

Grading Scheme 3

PART 1: INDUSTRY AND COMPANY ANALYSES 4

Executive Summary (Weight: 2%) 5

Company Background (Weight: 2%) 8

Industry Definition and Scanning (Weight: 5%) 15

Five Competitive Forces (Weight: 5%) 16

Identification of Opportunities and Threats (Weight: 2.5%) 19

Internal Analysis (Weight: 10%) 20

Identification of Strengths and Weaknesses (Weight: 2.5%) 22

Analysis Conclusions 29

Analysis Conclusions -> SWOT Matrix (Weight: 5%) 29

Analysis Conclusions -> Strategic Business Issues / Problems and Opportunities (Weight: 5%) 37

Grading Scheme

The CAPROJ1 rubric is based on a 100-90-80-70-35 grading scheme. Weights were assigned after the impact to the final recommendation and complexity of each part. Take note that the Documentation is 60% of the Final Academic Project Paneling Grade. Each rubric component should get at least an “Acceptable” rating in the documentation rubric in order for the P&D to be considered successful. Zero (0) grades are given only when it is not part of their thesis.

PART 1: INDUSTRY AND COMPANY ANALYSES

(Total Weight: 39%)

Executive Summary (Weight: 2%)

Executive Summary100

(Excellent) | Executive Summary90

(Very Good) | Executive Summary80

(Good) | Executive Summary70

(Acceptable) | Executive Summary35

(Unacceptable) | 0(None) |

Not more than a two (2) page which discusses all of the following components: 1. High-level company profile and industry it belongs to. 2. Summarization of problems uncovered. 3. Recommended system 4. Major benefits and...