Submitted by: Submitted by raviliza1
Views: 293
Words: 769
Pages: 4
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 11/22/2011 12:00 AM
Business Ethics
Lecture 1
0. Introduction
CSR = corporate social responsibility
Any ethics is an evaluation of good-bad. If something is bad – to do this is wrong. All these are connected.
* Normative ethics – we evaluate things. Instrument of evaluation.
* Positive ethics – we do not evaluated, we explain why other people evaluate things, why the sociality does behave like this.
* Instrumental ethics – we know what is good, we know how it really is, we see that some people behave badly – we need some policies, instruments to make people behave ethically. Before we do this, we should decide what is good and what is bad.
General ethics – fundamental ethics.
Medical/Business/Legal ethics are based on one discipline. Difference is in area of application
We can evaluate individual/particular actions, or a set of norms (systems).
1. Utilitarianism
General idea: analyze/evaluate consequences; see what will happen in the future
Main ideology of Raskolnilov: if we kill someone and the whole world wins – let’s kill him
Types:
* Strong version (we can measure the utility in units and we can change the utility, compare utilities, redistribute)
* Will the total amount of utility/happiness in the world increase?
* Indefinite (ex: we cannot compare gains and non-economic losses [quantity of dead people]. O the one hand…, on the other hand…)
* Better/improvement (we increase general amount of happiness, even if some people suffer)
* Worse (we decrease general amount of happiness, even if some people suffer)
* Weak version (utilities are non-comparable, we cannot compare, someone wins – someone loses, but we can’t measure happiness)
* Non-comparable (someone wins, but if хоть someone loses)
* Improvement (only winners may compensate losers)
Lecture 4
2. Deontology
End of the action = purpose of the action
MINMAX – maximize the minimum utility of the society
* Golden rule –...