Narrowcasting- a Harmless Medium or a Threat to Democracy?

Related Essays

The Main Threat To The Stability Of The Weimar Republic In The Period 1919-1923 Came From The Political Violence Of The Extreme Right
it deflected attention from the most serious threat to democracy the anti republicanism of the right wing as the perceived threat of left wing revolution made many
Media Cultural Studies
to Part II 7 (i) Operation Margarine; (ii) Myth Today Roland Barthes 8 The Medium is the Message Marshall McLuhan 89 91 99 107 vi Douglas M. Kellner and
Mass Communication
ownership to be a grave threat to democracy. Purposes Mass media can ... paper there, the earliest printed mass-medium was probably European popular prints from about
Mass Media
ownership to be a grave threat to democracy. Purposes Mass media can be ... paper there, the earliest printed mass-medium was probably European popular prints from

Submitted by to the category Other Topics on 03/31/2012 08:58 AM

Narrowcasting- a harmless medium or a threat to democracy?

INTRODUCTION

In this research essay, I have chosen to explore the question 1 on narrowcasting in this post-broadcast news era. In relation to the question given to me I will be discussing whether people are getting too little exposure to serious affairs outside their own areas of interest due to customised information sources via digital technology whose creditability can be questioned. And ultimately, whether these trends of narrowcasting will pose a threat to democracy.

In this essay I will be trying to draw a solid conclusion as to find out if amateur sources in narrowcasting are really credible or not, and whether or not people are getting less exposure because of narrowcasting, which is being accused of posing as a danger to the future of democracy.

In relation to this I have come up with a hypothesis statement: Credibility of amateur sources can be questioned and more exposure to Narrowcasting will lead to a lack of knowledge which will pose as a democratic threat. In order to construct a conclusion based on the above question and prove my hypothesis to be correct, we must first correctly define the meaning of the term narrowcasting in full context. Narrowcasting can be said to be “the diffusion of various genres in similar interest groups for a specific publics”. (Fleras, 2003)

From my comprehension of the question, I have generated 3 main points which I will discussing with the aid of various sources from a number of mediums, with the intent of drawing a credible conclusion.

These are my 3 main points:

1. Are online amateur sources really reliable?

2. Are people gaining less exposure and knowledge of the real world because of narrowcasting?

3. Is narrowcasting somewhat putting the future of democracy at risk?

A GLIMPS INTO THE STARTING POINT OF NARROWCASTING

The narrowcasting development started in the late 1960s to early 1970s in the...

View Full Essay
Full Essay Stats...
  • Words: 2912
  • Pages: 12
  • Views: 530