Are Leaders Born or Made?

Table of Contents

Introduction2

Is there a difference between leaders and managers2

Are leaders born or made2

Conclusion3

Reference List4

1. Introduction

It has been a question as old as mankind itself, “Are leaders born, and not made?” This subject has been the topic of discussion for many debates and theorist with great opposing notions. The most significant ones are the ones that believe that leaders are born with inherit qualities that propels them to a position of authority, and the ones that argue that leaders are not born but formed as a result of nurturing and experience. I, the author contend that leaders are born with certain qualities that enables them to lead. The author also insist that given the leaders’ exposure and responsibility, those very aspects must be developed and honed in to result in an authentic and worthy leader. Furthermore the question that has been asked has a prelude to it. “Can managers be developed, but leaders are born, not made”?

2. Is there a difference between leaders and managers?

According to Zaleznik (2004:1) there is a significant difference between managers and leaders. Leaders inspire people, stir passion in their followers and tolerate chaos are willing to delay outcomes to define the heart of the issues. Managers on the other hand are more structured, deviate from discord and seek stability in control. Zakeznik made a beautiful analogy between a leader and an artist -the same attributes resonate in their souls. They thrive on energy and have more in common with each other than leaders do with managers. They have a certain flair and charisma. Leaders influence people to get things done. Managers are problem-solvers that are dedication to ensure utilization of assets whether it is people, organizational structures or supplies. They are persistent to manage the available resources to maximize output. It is unwise to think that companies can survive without one or the other. To ensure maximum efficiency and...