Theory of Just War

Activity 8.3 - Research and Critical Thinking: Group Case Matthew Allen

Group 2: Theory of Just War

During your reading and reflection, identify ethical or moral justifications to support your arguments from the text or additional sources as necessary.

As I see things we are still in the “research and critical thinking” phase, or specifically activity 8.3. That being said we should quickly begin summarizing our findings as you both have begun to do. Let me introduce an interesting article from the BBC and a religious twist to consider. Here goes:

Just War - introduction

Introduction

The just war theory is a largely Christian philosophy that attempts to reconcile three things: •taking human life is seriously wrong, •states have a duty to defend their citizens, and defend justice, •protecting innocent human life and defending important moral values sometimes requires willingness to use force and violence

The theory specifies conditions for judging if it is just to go to war, and conditions for how the war should be fought.

Although it was extensively developed by Christian theologians, it can be used by people of every faith and none.

Purpose

The aim of Just War Theory is to provide a guide to the right way for states to act in potential conflict situations. It only applies to states, and not to individuals (although an individual can use the theory to help them decide whether it is morally right to take part in a particular war).

Just War Theory provides a useful framework for individuals and political groups to use for their discussions of possible wars.

The theory is not intended to justify wars but to prevent them, by showing that going to war except in certain limited circumstances is wrong, and thus motivate states to find other ways of resolving conflicts.

'Just', or merely 'permissible'?

The doctrine of the Just War can deceive a person into thinking that because a war is just, it's actually a good thing.

But behind contemporary war theory...