Submitted by: Submitted by jyoti1925
Views: 62
Words: 706
Pages: 3
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 03/12/2014 11:08 PM
Case 1 :
1. Was the suspension fair?
The suspension was fair. Joan has acted improperly many a time. Joan has not arranged alternatives for repeated personal problems.
THE SUSPENSION WAS FAIR, AS JOAN HAS REPEATED THE OFFENCE ONCE AGAIN
2. Did Joan act responsibly?
joan has not acted responsibily many a time.
JOAN DID ACT RIGHTLY, BUT WAS NOT CONVINCING.
3. Should she be fired?
Her baby sitter problems are not her employer's problems.
Yes she should be fired.
She can protest all she wants, no recourse. It is her Inability to show up for work!
____________________________
Yes, she apparently did nothing to mitigate the disruption to her employer. After numerous warnings, including one that stated in writing that future absences might result in termination ... she failed to take steps necessary to be available for work.
She could have lined up alternate sitters, but she did not.
She could have arranged for coverage for her shift, she did not do that either.
She should be fired for cause, meaning she would not qualify for unemployment in most states.
________________________
-------------------------------------------------
Did sylvia point out at the time that maybe joan could swap shifts with another employee or did she bring this up after the fact? Does sylvia have children? Does she know how hard it is to find a sitter last minute? Does sylvia understand as a mother joans first priorityare her children? Parents have rights in the work place too. No i dont think she should be fired and im sure there are laws that could make doing so illegal in certain situations
this is a commercial business house , who have a responsibility to the customers and stakeholders. Hence joan should be fired.
JOAN’S SUSPENSION WAS THE RIGHT APPROACH AND NOT OUTRIGHT FIRING FROM THE JOB.
Case 2 :
1) Should you tell your customers?
There is no need to tell the customers , as...