Submitted by: Submitted by shadow333
Views: 82
Words: 548
Pages: 3
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 05/18/2014 04:11 PM
1) How would you resolve the transfer pricing conflict? Present calculations to support your arguments.
Costs to Birch Paper Company on the proposed bids.
BIRCH PAPER COMPANY
Per 1,000 boxes
WEST PAPER CO: Out of pocket Cost to Birch $430
EIRE PAPER, LTD: $432
Less: Southern profit ($90*40%) $36
Thompson profit ($30-$25) 5 $41
Out of pocket cost to Birch $391
THOMPSON $480
Less: Southern profit ($280*40%) $112
Thompson profit ($480-$400) 80 $192
Out of pocket cost to Birch $288
The best bid for Birch Paper Company would be with Thompson, one of its own divisions, since it represents the lowest out of pocket cost to BPC. Since Birch Paper Company’s responsibility structure is an investment center, in order to maximize divisional profits Northern would chose the $430 bid from West since it represents the lowest cost, thereby resulting in higher profits. Due to the possible reoccurrence of these problems it is to the company’s benefit that the vice president should get involved, present the case to award the bid to Thompson, thereby setting precedence for all division to follow, avoiding future problems.
2) In what ways, if any, would you change Birch paper's transfer pricing rules?
This ability for individual price setting deters the divisions from making purchases internally, although in the long run the company benefits from choosing, either internally or externally, the option with the lowest cost to the firm. If Thompson was persuaded to alter their sales cost from $480 to $430 this would make them one of the lowest bidders and inturn Northern would be willing to accept their offer. This pricing change would allow Northern to go internally without the vice president’s involvement.
Shown below are a break-down of the out of pocket cost to Birch and the reduction of the contribution margin to Thompson.
THOMPSON $430
Less: Southern profit ($280*40%) $112...