E Cigarettes Should Not Be Included in Smoking Bans

Both Bradley County and East Ridge Council(In UK) are considering new ordinances to add a smoke-free product - e cigarettes, to public smoking bans. Rationales for regulatory actions vary. Often, they revolve around misplaced fears that e-cigarettes will misperceptions that e-cigarette vapor is as harmful as cigarettes, as well as serve as a gateway to the use of conventional cigarettes by kids and nonsmokers, In fact, e cigarettes should not be included in smoking bans. e cigarette wholesale: teamgiant.net

Both fears are unsupported by evidence. Regarding the "gateway" theory, a University of Oklahoma study found that only 43 of 1,300 college students (3.3 percent) reported that e-cigarettes were the first form of nicotine they'd tried, with only one student later taking up regular cigarette smoking. furthermore, there is growing evidence that e-cigarettes have nearly NONE of the harmful properties of tabacco cigarettes, primarily because nothing is burned in "vaping" As a result, users and bystanders are not exposed to the harmful levels of cancer-causing toxins and the multitude of chemicals that result from the combustion of tobacco. A study released by Drexel University's School of Public Health this fall found NO evidence that e-cigarettes expose users or bystanders to levels of contaminants that would warrant health concerns.

The point is that these devices is to help smokers quit their unhealthy habit. So shouldn’t we be encouraging to use e-cigarettes? e cigarette wholesale: teamgiant.net

In the debate over e cigarettes, the goal has been forgotten by some policymakers. Instead, legislators in cities like San Francisco and New York City have seen to justify these laws by some variant of, "I don't approve of smoking, this looks like smoking, so it must be banned even though it isn’t smoking." This is not how rational public policy is formed.

If the goal is to minimize smoking-related illnesses and diseases, local policymakers should preserve...