Effectiveness of Working Capital Management

Submitted by: Submitted by

Views: 104

Words: 457

Pages: 2

Category: Business and Industry

Date Submitted: 07/25/2014 01:57 AM

Report This Essay

Marist Brothers

Notre Dame of Dadiangas University

Marist Avenue, General Santos City

Correction Matrix

TITLE OF THE STUDY:Effectiveness of Working Capital Management of the Selected Small and Medium Enterprises in

General Santos City

Group Members: Jenny Rose Biana Date of Defense:January 24, 2014

Christa Cassandra Borja

Melissa Moises Venue:Defense Room 2

Panelist: Mr. Joe Michael Jimenez,MBA Ms. Vanessa G. Balboa-Jimenez,MBA

Adviser: Mrs. Angelita C. Ty,CPA

Comments/Suggestions | Name of the Panelist | Revision Made |

Chapter 1 | | |

* Limit the Introduction to 1 ½ - 2 pages (p. 1) | Mr. Joe Michael Jimenez&Ms. Vanessa G. Balboa-Jimenez | The Introduction was cut into 1 ½ - 2 pages (pp. 1 – 2). |

* Restate the definition of Effectiveness in the Definition of Terms (p. 7) | Mr. Joe Michael Jimenez&Ms. Vanessa G. Balboa-Jimenez | The definition of Effectiveness was restated. |

* Specify the number of SMEs five years ago or last year in comparison with today. | Ms. Vanessa G. Balboa-Jimenez | The number of SMEs from the past years has been specified (p. 2). |

Chapter 2 | | |

* None | | |

Chapter 3 | | |

* Change the Output/Outcome in the Figure 2 (p. 46) | Mr. Joe Michael Jimenez | From “Evaluation of Working Capital Management Practices Adopted by SMEs” to “Improvement of Working Capital Management Practices Adopted by SMEs” |

* Discuss further about the importance of SMES in GSC to strengthen the needs for effective working capital management (p. 47) | Ms. Vanessa G. Balboa-Jimenez | The content in the Research Locale has been revised by adding or deducting some paragraphs (p. 47). |

* Consistency of the Number of Respondents from the Respondents of the Study (p. 58) and Sampling Technique (p. 49) | Mr. Joe Michael Jimenez&Ms. Vanessa G. Balboa-Jimenez | From 234 respondents to 216 respondents and the 10% non-acceptance rate was deleted (p. 48). |

*...