Formalist Criticism

FORMALIST CRITICISM

1. Literature is a form of knowledge with intrinsic elements--style, structure, imagery, tone, and genre.

2. What gives a literary work status as art, or as a great work of art, is how all of its elements work together to create the reader's total experience (thought, feeling, gut reactions, etc.)

3. The appreciation of literature as an art requires close reading--a careful, step-by-step analysis and explication of the text (the language of the work). An analysis may follow from questions like, how do various elements work together to shape the effect on the reader?

4. Style and theme influence each other and can't be separated if meaning is to be retained. It's this interdependence in form and content that makes a text "literary." "Extracting" elements in isolation (theme, character, ploy, setting, etc.) may destroy a reader's aesthetic experience of the whole.

5. Formalist critics don't deny the historical, political situation of a work, they just believe works of art have the power to transcend by being "organic wholes"--akin to a being with a life of its own.

6. Formalist criticism is evaluative in that it differentiates great works of art from poor works of art. Other kinds of criticism don't necessarily concern themselves with this distinction.

7. Formalist criticism is decidedly a "scientific" approach to literary analysis, focusing on "facts amenable to "verification" (evidence in the text).

Formalist criticism is understanding a story written exactly as it is presented within narrative conventions (narrative conventions being things like metaphor, plot, setting, characterization, symbolism). Formalist critics are able to examine the relationship between form and meaning in a work, which inevitably highlights the subtle complexity in the 'form' of the story or how it is arranged. Formalists pay attention to diction, irony, paradox, metaphor, and symbol, as well as the basic narrative conventions outlined...