Nature vs Nurture

QUESTION 1

The nature vs. nurture discussion is a longstanding debate about the impacts of science and social frameworks on people and conduct. The "nature" view of the argument contends that individuals are molded by heredity and science. The "nurture" perspective contends that our cooperation in social life is the most paramount determinant of who we are and how we carry on. Case in point, there is contradiction over whether men and ladies contrast due to natural variables, for example, hormones or whether the contrasts are because of socialization and other social strengths. This analytical composition discourses the impact of both nature and nurture on identity traits, moreover which one has a higher dominance on the impingement it has on personality.

Firstly, prenatal environment illustrates the impact nurture has on one’s character. The concept of prenatal environment can be exemplified through the amount of stress a mother experiences during pregnancy may alter the infant’s stress response. That is, mothers who have experienced an unusual amount of stress during pregnancy tend to have an infant with impaired stress function; a faster, stronger, more pronounced physiological response to stress; and a higher baseline level of stress hormones, all of which persist into childhood (Barbazanges, 1996; Clark & Schneider, 1997). Furthermore, as indicated by Skinner (1997), individuals and animals have the same routines in forming their personality. Skinner's operant molding hypothesis of identity clarifies that the identity of individuals is molded by the environment's social operators. These are the subject's guardians, peers, religion, media, and society. Parents impact their offspring by raising them in a certain manner as they develop, they are the first educators. However the guardian's style in raising their youngsters decide the identity of the youngster as they develop into grown-ups.

Next is the associate of the individual. Associates are the...