Summary

Writing as a Mode of Learning Author(s): Janet Emig Source: College Composition and Communication, Vol. 28, No. 2 (May, 1977), pp. 122-128 Published by: National Council of Teachers of English Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/356095 . Accessed: 09/09/2014 23:57

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

.

National Council of Teachers of English is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to College Composition and Communication.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 198.162.96.162 on Tue, 9 Sep 2014 23:57:29 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

as hWriting a [Mode Learning of

JANET EMIG represents a unique mode of learning-not merely valuable, not merely special, but unique. That will be my contention in this paper. The thesis is straightforward. Writing serves learning uniquely because writing as process-andproduct possesses a cluster of attributes that correspond uniquely to certain powerful learning strategies. Although the notion is clearly debatable, it is scarcely a private belief. Some of the most distinguished contemporary psychologists have at least implied such a role for writing as heuristic. Lev Vygotsky, A. R. Luria, and Jerome Bruner, for example, have all pointed out that higher cognitive functions, such as analysis and synthesis, seem to develop most fully only with the support system of verbal language-particularly, it seems, of written language.' Some of their arguments and evidence will be incorporated here. Here I have...