Week 2 Quiz

MGT350 Critical Thinking Strategies in Decision Making

July 27, 2010, Week 2 quiz

Name_______________________________________

Impacts

Goals

Objectives

Training

Preparing

Questions

Problem

Appeal To Emotion.

Contrary To Fact Hypothesis.

Effects

Decision

Communicating

Criteria

Causes

Alternatives

Sustaining

Monitoring

Ad Hominem Or Attacking The Person

Ad Ignorantium Or Appeal To Ignorance

Ad Verecuniam Or Appeal To Authority

University of Phoenix Decision Making Model

Framing the _______________

Identify the ______________

Define _______________, ________________, _______________

Evaluate ______________ of the problem

Making the ____________________

Identify _____________ of the problem

Frame _______________

Evaluate _______________ of alternatives

Make the decision

Evaluating the decision

Implement the decision

__________________________ the decision to internal and external stakeholders

____________________ and _______________________ for decision implementation

___________________ the decision and __________________ implementation

Measure impacts

List of Logical Fallacies

____________________________

In this fallacy, the arguer uses emotional appeals rather than logical reasons to persuade the listener. The fallacy can appeal to various emotions including pride, pity, fear, hate, vanity, or sympathy. The appeal to sympathy is actually a formal fallacy labeled Ad Misericordiam. Generally, the issue is oversimplified to the advantage of the arguer. Example: In 1972, there was a widely printed advertisement printed by the Foulke Fur Co., which was in reaction to the frequent protests against the killing of Alaskan seals for the making of fancy furs. According to the advertisement, clubbing the seals was one of the great conservation stories of our history, a mere exercise in wildlife...