Submitted by: Submitted by lpalomino
Views: 28
Words: 390
Pages: 2
Category: Science and Technology
Date Submitted: 03/29/2015 06:44 AM
NETW360
Name
NETW360, Professor
Date
Lab #4, Creating a Wireless CAN
Lab Report
Manufacturer of the selected equipment:
1. Artolink Optical Wireless Long Range FSO
Will Connect:
Police Station to animal shelter
City hall to Public Works, Fire Station, and Animal Shelter
2. Artolink Optical Wirless Middle Range FSO
Will Connect
Public Works to Fire Station
Police Station to City Hall
Fire Station to Animal Shelter
Public Works to Animal Shelter
Public Works to Police Station
Fire Station to Police Station
Model number of the selected equipment:
1. Artolink M1-FE-L-BCx
2. Artolink M1-FE-L
Cost of each piece of equipment required:
1. $4,500 x 4
2. $3,500 x 6
How the equipment should be mounted to each building:
1. Mounted on roof of all buildings
2. Mounted on roof of all buildings
The speed each link will be able to achieve:
1. 100 Mbit/s
2. 1000 Mbit/s
For the radio frequency link what band will be used and the possible channels in that band that could be used. Explain why you selected this band and why you rejected the other possible bands.
1. 5.8 GHz for less interference from other 5 GHz frequencies including the medium range FSO antenna.
2. 5 GHz because most WiFi signals are still 2.4 GHz.
For the evaluation report you should state in your view which solution is the best value for this installation. Explain why you selected this solution. Explain why you rejected the other solution.
I chose these two products to configure the FSO connections to our government locations because it accommodates the latest technology and best security for our CAN. Although the price is a little high, this should be a significant and safe network that will last us at least a decade. The...