Submitted by: Submitted by mjm25502
Views: 10
Words: 18666
Pages: 75
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 09/01/2015 07:57 PM
02-P2013 12/19/2001 5:19 PM Page 15
2
Financial Review
and Pro Forma
Analysis
MARKET VIEW
The Quaker Oats Company—
The Significant Cost of Valuation Errors
The Quaker Oats Company’s $1.7 billion purchase of Snapple in late 1994
stands as one of that decade’s worst acquisitions. With Snapple’s poor operating performance dragging the consolidated operating results down, Quaker’s stock price stagnated while the Dow Jones industrial average moved up
by more than 70 percent. So now that Quaker has sold the beverage company,
should Quaker shareholders celebrate?
Mourning would be more appropriate. The price Quaker paid for its softdrink misadventure goes well beyond the $1.4 billion in losses directly associated with the sale of Snapple to Triarc Company for just $300 million. In
addition, Quaker absorbed more than $100 million in cash losses and charges
related to Snapple from 1994 to 1997. And since the deal damaged its balance
sheet, Quaker’s credit rating suffered, raising its cost of capital.
Another cost: Quaker helped pay for the acquisition by selling its petfood
and candy businesses that had given it a larger scale, steady earnings, and international reach. It also paid punishing capital-gains taxes on those sales.
The total losses associated with the Snapple acquisition may well exceed
the original acquisition price.
Adapted from G. Burns, “What Price the Snapple Debacle?” Business Week, 14 April
1997, 42.
•
•
•
15
02-P2013 12/19/2001 5:19 PM Page 16
16
Valuation: Avoiding the Winner’s Curse
Why did more than 50 percent of the major mergers and acquisitions in
the United States completed in the 1990s, according to Business Week
magazine, erode shareholder value? And why did more than 77 percent
of those transactions, according to Forbes magazine, not earn a rate of
return at least equivalent to the cost of the capital necessary to finance
them? The answer to both questions is often the same: overestimation...