Mgmt 520 Complete Course

Submitted by: Submitted by

Views: 10

Words: 3287

Pages: 14

Category: Other Topics

Date Submitted: 09/17/2015 10:57 PM

Report This Essay

MGMT 520 Complete Course

IF You Want To Purcahse A+ Work then Click The Link Below For Instant Down Load

http://www.hwprofile.com/?download=mgmt-520-complete-course

IF You Face Any Problem Then E Mail Us At JOHNMATE1122@GMAIL.COM

Week 2

Pick an administrative agency of either the federal or a state government. Find where the current and proposed regulation changes for that agency are located on the Internet…

1. State the administrative agency which controls the regulation. Explain why this agency and your proposed regulation interest you (briefly). Will this proposed regulation affect you or the business in which you are working? If so, how?

2. Describe the proposal/change

3. Write the public comment which you would submit to this proposal. If the proposed regulation deadline has already passed, write the comment you would have submitted. Explain briefly what you wish to accomplish with your comment.

4. Provide the “deadline” by which the public comment must be made. (If the date has already passed, please provide when the deadline was).

5. a) Once you have submitted your comment, what will you be legally entitled to do later in the promulgation process (if you should choose to do so)?

b) If the proposal passes, identify and explain the five legal theories you could use in an attempt to have the regulation declared invalid and overturned in court.

c) Which of these challenges would be the best way to challenge the regulation you selected for this assignment if you wanted to have the regulation overturned and why?

Week 3

Go to Kubasek, Chapter 13, page 369, problem 13-16. Use Lexis in the Keller library and look up the Nadel er al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case…

Now, in the library, click the “Shepardize” button in the top right of the LexisNexis page on the case. This provides you with all of the case which have used Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc…

1. What must a party establish to prevail on a motion for...