Submitted by: Submitted by Lind11
Views: 10
Words: 422
Pages: 2
Category: Other Topics
Date Submitted: 10/04/2015 10:42 AM
ROLE OF THE APRN
This article compares and contrasts the attitudes and opinions of physicians and nurse
practitioners on what they believe the roles, responsibilities, scopes of practice, and
reimbursement should be for nurse practitioners in the primary care setting. The purpose is to
look at the role of nurse practitioners and the effects on health care if the supply of nurse
practitioners is increased and the scope of their practice is expanded. A study including 467
randomly selected nurse practitioners and 505 randomly selected physicians (all providing direct
patient care primary care practices) was done to gather information about the attitudes and
opinions of physicians and nurse practitioners toward these issues. Both groups were questioned
via mail surveys and were all asked the same group of questions.
The two groups had opposing attitudes toward roles and scope of practice for nurse
practitioners. Nearly three-fourths of the nurse practitioners surveyed reported that they are
allowed to practice to the full extent of their education and training. They report that regulations,
and work setting are factors limiting them from practicing within their scope of practice. Of the
physicians surveyed, only seventeen percent reported that they believe that nurse practitioners
should be allowed to lead medical homes; eighty two percent of nurse practitioners report that
they have the education and ability to lead a medical home. Nearly ninety percent of the
physicians surveyed agreed that nurse practitioners defer certain types of patient care services
and procedures to a physician. Sixty-one percent of nurse practitioners agreed with this.
Reimbursement was the area with the largest discrepancy in opinion on the survey
between the two groups. Ninety-six percent of physicians surveyed disagree that nurse
practitioners should be paid equally for the same services provided by the...