Submitted by: Submitted by elinakivl97
Views: 10
Words: 539
Pages: 3
Category: Other Topics
Date Submitted: 02/01/2016 06:51 AM
Contract Law Revision – Cases
Offer and Acceptance – Chapter 2
* Assessing contractual intent > Storer v Manchester City Council (1974)
* Facts: earlier case also involving a council tenant's right to buy his property
* D sent P a document titled Agreement for Sale and a letter which stated: If you will sign the Agreement and return it, I will send you the Agreement signed on behalf of the council in exchange
* P signed and returned the Agreement for Sale
* Labour party took control of the council and did not return a signed copy, refusing to sell the property
* P sued for breach of contract
HELD:
There was a binding obligation on D to sell
Lord Denning: In contracts you do not look into the actual intent in a man's mind. You look to what he said and did. A contract is formed when there is, to all outward appearances, contract. A man cannot get out of a contract by saying 'I did not intend to contract' if by his words he has done so... objectively, to a reasonable man D's letter appeared to commit to selling the property if P returned the documents
> Gibson v Manchester City Council (1979)
Facts:
* P was a council tenant and received a letter from D inviting an application to buy the council house
* D's letter stated: The Corporation may be prepared to sell the house to you at the purchase price of £2,725... If you would like to make formal application to buy your Council house, please complete the enclosed application form...
* P completed the application
* D was a newly elected council and refused to accept P's application
* P sued for breach of contract
HELD:
Held that D's letter was not a contractual offer, which P could accept formal application by P was an offer, that D did not accept
Lord Diplock: The words 'may be prepared to sell' are fatal... [D's letter is] setting out the financial terms on which it may be the council will be prepared...