Submitted by: Submitted by HoaDinh
Views: 10
Words: 311
Pages: 2
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 02/23/2016 05:57 AM
Evaluation Criteria for
selecting ERP Systems
Case study: HBS - Harley Davidson
Background
• Harley Davison planned to implement new an enterprise-wide
procurement and supplier management system.
• Process to choose a Supplier:
• Requested a quote (RFQ)
• Provider conference
• Results: 3 possible providers
• 8 providers chosen based on their self rating on RFQ
• Narrowing down to 3 providers:
Objective
• Determining the criteria list to select ERP system supplier in
manufacturing area
• Who should they choose as their supplier and partner in implementing an
enterprise-wide procurement and supplier management system?
• On what criteria should that decision be based?
• How should the team balance the various strengths and weaknesses of each
supplier candidate in making a final decision?
Framework
• Comparative Criteria in ERP Selection in Manufacturing Firms by Baki
and Çaki [2005]
• Reviewed criteria considered by:
• Prior studies in manufacturing firms
• A survey of 55 Turkish manufacturing companies
Framework
• Combine Baki and Çaki framework with weighted scoring method
• Allocation of weights to each criteria to reflect their relative importance
• Use a 1-10 scale:
• 1 : Lowest possible importance
• 10: Highest possible importance
• Scores to each supplier to reflect how it performs in relation to each criteria
• Use a 1-10 scale:
• 1 : Extremely Good
• 10: Extremely Poor
• Select the supplier with the highest total score.
Group’s Analysis Method
• Method to identify weight for each criteria
• Individual works
• Group discussion for final weight
Group’s Analysis Method
• Method to identify score of 3 providers for each
criteria
• Individual works
• Group discussion for final score
4
10
7
Different
significantly
Analysis Results
Different
slightly
Highest Score
828
838
808
Recommendation
• In case HD select Provider 2 that offers the best functionality
• Suggestion to deal with the weakness of provider 2:
• Request Provider 2 find...