Submitted by: Submitted by karl02
Views: 10
Words: 448
Pages: 2
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 07/14/2016 09:58 AM
Objectives
Identify what is the problem of the case
To know who are the person involved in the promotion
To know what are the facts to be considered
To recognize who will fit for the vacant position
Facts of the case
Henry victory
* 3 years working at flight kitchen with a very satisfactory performance
* He was rarely absent and never been late
* He was praised by airline passengers because of his good cooking skills
* He is efficient he could do more work in less time and offered to help the others as soon as he had finished his own assignments
* His other co employee resented him because of his attitude “I know better”
Mr. Ma nuk
* He is working at flight kitchen for over a year only
* He’s not been doing supervisory work because he cannot plan ahead and does not like paper work and cost calculation
* He is a very good cook from ma mon luk
* He is an outsider
* When he enters the flight kitchen Mr. Wong appoint him as assistant supervisor
Problem of the case
Due to the sudden death of Mr. C buyas (former supervisor of the flight kitchen) that results for his position to be empty and a replacement must take in place before the executive committee meeting in two days. And for that the company doesn’t know whom to put up for the vacant position. And if ever Mr. Henry will be promoted who will prepare the dish in flight kitchen.
Areas of consideration
* Henry victory is aspiring for the position
* Henry is working at the company for 3 years while ma nuk is over a year only
* Ma nuk is not doing supervisory work
* Mr. C. buyas claimed that henry was not well like by his fellow employee because of his attitude
* Henry is more efficient than Ma nuk
Recommendation
If I were Mr. Wong I will give Henry a chance to become the supervisor of the flight kitchen because of his commendatory performance and skills that gives the customers satisfaction and also I will promote him because of...