Business Ethics - Explain Which View of Property Locke’s or Marx’s Lies Behind the Positions of the Drug Companies Glaxosmithkline and Bristol Myers Squibb and of the Indian Companies Such as Cipla.

Submitted by: Submitted by

Views: 10

Words: 551

Pages: 3

Category: Other Topics

Date Submitted: 07/30/2016 01:01 AM

Report This Essay

WE PROVIDE KSBM MBA EMBA BMS DMS GDM CASE

STUDY ANSWERS, ASSIGNMENT SOLUTIONS,

PROJECT REPORTS AND THESIS

aravind.banakar@gmail.com

ARAVIND - 09901366442 – 09902787224

www.mbacasestudyanswers.com

BUSINESS ETHICS

1.

Explain, in light of their theories, what Locke, Smith, Ricardo, and Marx would

probably say about the events in this case.

2.

Explain which view of property-Locke’s or Marx’s- lies behind the positions of the

drug companies GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol-Myers Squibb and of the Indian

companies such as Cipla. Which of the two group-GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol-Myers

Squibb on the one hand, and the Indian companies on the other –do you think holds the

correct view of property in this case? Explain your answer.

1.

Identify the behaviors that you think are ethically questionable in the history of

Microsoft. Evaluate the ethics of these behaviors.

2.

What characteristics of the market for operating systems do you think created the

monopoly market that Microsoft’s operating system enjoyed? Evaluate this market in

terms of utilitarianism, rights, and justice (your analysis should make use of the

textbook’s discussion of the effects of monopoly markets on the utility of participants in

the market, on the moral rights of participants in the market, and on the distribution of

benefits and burdens among participants in the market), giving explicit examples from

the operating systems industry to illustrate your points.

3.

In your view, should the government have sued Microsoft for violation of the

antitrust laws? In your view, was Judge Jackson’s order that Microsoft be broken into

two companies fair to Microsoft? Was Judge Kollar-Kotelly’s November 1, 2004 decision

fair? Was the April 2004 decision of the European Commission fair to Microsoft?

Explain your answers.

4.

Who, if anyone, is harmed by the kind of market that Microsoft’s operating

system has enjoyed? Explain your answer. What kind of public policies, if any, should...