Pepsico vs Environment

Corporate obligation to environment: an examination of the performance of PepsiCo.

In recent years, discerning all sorts of disasters occurred frequently, people are more and more drawing their attention to the issue of environment. Companies, as the main members in the whole society, particularly have the social responsibility to protect the environment which is not only closely linked to every person’s interest, but also beneficial to the stakeholders, especially those companies such as consumable companies (Aqueveque and Encina 2010). One such corporation is PepsiCo, which is one of the world’s largest multi-national foods and beverages production companies. On the one hand, drinks under the brand of PepsiCo are sold well all around the world with its top global talent. On the other hand, the scrap production materials for the bottle discharged by the manufactory are known as a severe threatens to the environment and community. PepsiCo is supposed to balance their profits with the producing motivation towards to the socially responsible manner, particularly responsible to environment (Morris 2008). It is highly expected that companies should manage their businesses in a legal performance way as a reflecting of responsibility to eco-environment (Gibbs 2009). It is necessary for their managers to take a consideration into their responsibility to maximum wealth for shareholders and balance the performance for stakeholders (Aqueveque and Encina 2010). The stakeholders of this paper focus on the community, consumer and government which will be affected by the performance of PepsiCo. The essay will analyze the performance of PepsiCo in terms of the environment issues. And through analyzing the relationship between corporate and environment aims to present the on-balanced argument with both positive and negative impact and implication of the PepsiCo’s actions on the society and stakeholders.

Case for PepsiCo.

It is always discussed that as the main part of...