Corporate Social Responsibility

U51000 Third Assignment - Marking and Feedback Sheet

You MUST submit the entire set of blank marking criteria, signed ACO coversheet and assignment stapled together.

Assignment Author (Name & Student No.): _______________________

Assessor (Student name and number)): ___________________________

Workshop Leader: ___________________________________________

Moderated by: ________________________________________________

Date: ______________ Final Mark: ___________________

Using the following marking feedback form, grade each criterion as either: A (excellent/v. good); B+ (good); B (fair); C (poor); D (borderline pass); or F (Fail)

Overall grade the assignment as either a high, medium or low within a grade band and award marks as indicated

Grade | Possible marks |

AExcellent/very good | 85 (high) |

| 78 (medium |

| 71 (low) |

B+Good | 68 |

| 65 |

| 61 |

BFair | 58 |

| 55 |

| 51 |

CPoor | 48 |

| 45 |

| 41 |

DBorderline | 40 |

FFail | 38 |

| 31 |

| 25 |

Governing Health Warning: The use of Google, Wikipedia or ‘I’, ‘Me’ and ‘My’ can seriously damage your marks in University assignments.

Marking Criteria |

| Grade | Comments |

Clear statement of purpose (Guide: 10% of marks) | | Has the author stated the purpose of the assignment clearly early on in the assignment? Have they ‘deconstructed’ or unpicked the question? |

Analysis of the case based on relevant evidence and theory to build the argument(Guide: 30% of marks) | | Has the author evidenced their train of reasoning through correct referencing to credible sources? Credible sources should include credible journal articles NOT web sites accessed through Google. The skill of finding relevant, credible and current information is key to writing a critical report. Is the argument ‘adequate’? The author needs to make more than one or two good points and, if appropriate, consider the argument...