English

GLISHJohn paul paltao

Bsba-ma 1-4

(B1)

On Tuesday, Senators rejected representative Ignacio “iggy” Arroyo’s account that the secondhand helicopters sold as brand new to the pnp had been “leased” to the family owned company LTA Inc. and had not been owned by his brother, Jose Miguel Arroyo, the former first gentlemen.

Senator Teofisto Guingona III said the committee would send an invitation on Thursday to the congressman to show up to the hearing on Monday.

“If he doesn’t want to appear at the hearing, I will invite the person who will prove that he is lying on the issue of the helicopters,” Lacson said,” Not only that, that he is really a liar.”

Through his lawyer, Ignacio produced a copy of a lease agreement supposedly showing that mike arroyo did not own the helicopters.

Ignacio said Lionair Inc. leased the choppers to LTA Inc. which he was the president at that time.

In a statement read on Monday by Ignacio’s lawyer, Andresito Fornier, he said that when the lease agreement was signed with Lionair, his brother mike was not part of LTA Inc.

Mike reacquired shares in LTA Inc. in November 2010 and become its president, According to fornier.

Witnesses, Including Lionair owner Archibald Po, had testified that mike had owned the two used choppers.

The major players in this news are: Iggy and Mike Arroyo, The Philippine national police and the senate inquiry.

In this news that I’ve read in the Philippine daily inquirer, Senator Lacson stated a lot of propositions one of this is when he said that “If he (Ignacio) doesn’t appear at the hearing, I will invite the person who will prove that he is lying on this issue of the helicopters”.

This merely is a hypothetical proposition because it may affirm or deny something with that of the condition.

He also said that “The so-called lease agreement does not bear the names and signatures of witnesses”.

Which is I think presented properly and is a proposition that denies.

Based on the news that I’ve read, the...