Submitted by: Submitted by children8374
Views: 446
Words: 346
Pages: 2
Category: Other Topics
Date Submitted: 10/30/2011 07:44 PM
RUNNING HEADER: E-TEXT
E-TEXT
Name
RES 342
E-TEXT
10.30
A. H0:equalsπ1 = π2 Versus H1: π1 >π2
B. Z > 2.326 and to reject null hypothesis.
C. ρ1 =.0001304, ρ2 =.0000296 and Z =2.961
D. This would be a reject null hypothesis. The sample is a significant of the difference between the two proportions.
E. P-Value is .0015. This type of result is not by chance.
F. Yes, the severe consequences of the accidents are small to make the difference.
G. -------------------------------------------------
The assumption is questionable due to the 4 only accidents that were observed with those who were the yellow fire trucks.
10.44
A. H0:π1> = π2
H1:π1< π2
B. Z = -3.987 P =.0, The null hypothesis is a reject
C. This is a normal assumption.
D. Yes, the important is the differences.
E. -------------------------------------------------
The physicians are to be asked about the habits, weight, nutrition, etc.
10.46
A. H0:μ2 versus H1: μ1> μ2
B. T =1.221, P = .1141 rounded
C. The sample is not statistically significant. They would know that 8 points makes an important difference.
D. Yes, the standard deciations are similar.
E. F equals .620, FL equals .488 and FR equals 2.05. It fails to reject the null hypothesis. The variances are not different because of lack of evidence.
-------------------------------------------------
So 384.16/620.01 equals .6196
11.24
Varmints mean damage.
1290 +1390+1400+1850+950 / 5 equals to 1376 the standard deviation is 321.83
Weasel mean damage.
1090+1830+2100+1920+1250 / 5 equals to 1638 the standard deviation is 441.78 rounded.
P value is .4188, F equals to .936
Significance is .5
This cannot be a reject to the null hypothesis since it is an equal means. The p passes .05 and there are no differences. This is a result that clearly agrees with the Levenes test which the p value is .715. And they overlap the confidence...