Submitted by: Submitted by jelle
Views: 463
Words: 335
Pages: 2
Category: Literature
Date Submitted: 12/17/2011 05:30 AM
appeAppendixes
1)
Figure 1.1
Descriptive Statistics |
| N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation |
length of service | 471 | 0 | 43 | 5.03 | 5.795 |
Total Staff Satisfaction Scale | 491 | 10 | 50 | 33.97 | 7.069 |
Valid N (listwise) | 435 | | | | |
Figure 1.2
RECODE service (Lowest thru 2=1) (3 thru 5=2) (6 thru Highest=3) INTO servicegp.
EXECUTE.
Figure 1.3
Descriptive Statistics |
| N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Std. Deviation |
servicegp1 | 239 | 14.00 | 50.00 | 34.7364 | 6.96461 |
servicegp2 | 116 | 19.00 | 48.00 | 33.3103 | 6.52409 |
servicegp3 | 136 | 10.00 | 50.00 | 33.1838 | 7.58576 |
Valid N (listwise) | 99 | | | | |
2.
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
3.
Figure 3.1
ANOVA |
|
Total Staff Satisfaction Scale | | | | |
| Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. |
Between Groups | 554,886 | 2 | 277,443 | 5,880 | ,003 |
Within Groups | 19863,395 | 421 | 47,181 | | |
Total | 20418,281 | 423 | | | |
Figure 3.2
Multiple Comparisons |
Total Staff Satisfaction ScaleTukey HSD | | | | |
(I) servicegp | (J) servicegp | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval |
| | | | | Lower Bound | Upper Bound |
1,00 | 2,00 | 2,259* | ,825 | ,018 | ,32 | 4,20 |
| 3,00 | 2,386* | ,788 | ,007 | ,53 | 4,24 |
2,00 | 1,00 | -2,259* | ,825 | ,018 | -4,20 | -,32 |
| 3,00 | ,127 | ,868 | ,988 | -1,92 | 2,17 |
3,00 | 1,00 | -2,386* | ,788 | ,007 | -4,24 | -,53 |
| 2,00 | -,127 | ,868 | ,988 | -2,17 | 1,92 |
*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. | |
Figure 3.3
Test of Homogeneity of Variances |
Total Staff Satisfaction Scale | |
Levene Statistic | df1 | df2 | Sig. |
1,819 | 2 | 421 | ,164 |
5.
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.2
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Ranks |
| servicegp | N | Mean Rank |
Total Staff Satisfaction Scale | 1,00 | 172 | 237,02 |
| 2,00 | 116 | 196,88 |
| 3,00 | 136 | 194,81 |
|...