Journal of Applied Corporate Finance

Submitted by: Submitted by

Views: 510

Words: 9064

Pages: 37

Category: Business and Industry

Date Submitted: 01/12/2012 12:13 PM

Report This Essay

Journal of Applied Corporate Finance

F A L L 2 0 03 V O L U M E 15 . 4

Global Evidence on the Equity Risk Premium

by Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, and Mike Staunton, London Business School

GLOBAL EVIDENCE ON THE EQUITY RISK PREMIUM

by Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, and Mike Staunton, London Business School*

oday, investors have more cause than ever to ask what returns they can expect from equities, and what the future riskreward tradeoff is likely to be. Corporate managers, too, need to know what returns their shareholders require for projects of differing risk. And regulators have to know the cost of equity capital in order to set “fair” rates of return for regulated industries. In fact, the magnitude of the equity risk premium—the incremental return that shareholders require to hold risky equities rather than risk-free securities—is one of the most important issues in corporate finance. It drives future equity returns and is a key determinant of the cost of capital. This article sheds light on the equity risk premium by addressing two fundamental questions: How big has the equity risk premium been historically? And what can we expect for the future? To answer these questions, we need to look at long periods of capital market history, and to extend our horizons beyond just the United States. We start by examining equity returns in 16 different countries over the 103-year period from 1900 to 2002.

T

THE NEED FOR A LONG-RUN PERSPECTIVE The dangers of focusing just on recent stock market history are easily demonstrated. Over the last decade of the 20th century, U.S. equity investors achieved a total return (capital gain plus reinvested dividends) of 17.6% per annum, thus increasing their initial stake by a factor of five. During the last five years of the 1990s, U.S. equities achieved high returns every year, ranging from 21% in 1996 to as much as 36% in 1995. Investors became convinced that high corporate growth rates could be extrapolated into the...