High Tech Offenders

High-tech crimes hold the ability to greatly change our awareness of crime. Criminal wire transfers of huge asset stores, nuclear subterfuge, and computer crimes are up-and-coming as novel forms of criminal enterprise. There is no way to control what type of crimes will come in the future. That is why the police need to be on the harsh edge of crime. When the police are not, they pave the way for criminals to walk all over them and their citizens. Efforts to control high-tech crime have opened a “Pandora’s Box” of issues. The issues relating to criminal investigations and prosecution are caught up by free speech and it guarantees of hi-tech privacy. The only way to deal with crime is case by case. There is no all normal way to group all crime into one sentence. Since new crimes are taking place on a daily basis, there is no way to determine the right to handle each offender. However, there should be strict violations for computer crimes. Computer crimes seem to be the wave of the future and that is one of those things that if something is not done about it, it will just keep getting bigger and bigger. In conclusion, there is no one-way approach to fighting crime. If there was it would be one of swift and stiff punishment for offenders. The laws about violations with the computer should be written or revised to encompass the new crimes and there should be a back door that allows lawmakers to include new offenses when they come around. Differential Association Theory

This theory recommended that crime is learnt by means of associating with criminal definitions that strength usually support crime or be neutralizations that approve of crime below certain situation (Hemmens & Tibbets, 2010). For example, it views interacting with antisocial peers as a major cause of crime. According to the theory, criminal behavior will become chronic and be repeated if it is reinforced. Where criminal subcultures are in existence, many individuals can become criminals and therefore...