Case Studies - Fnb Ohio

Index

Executive Summary

Weaknesses

1. Management Weaknesses.

2.1. Unfairness functional behavior

2.2. Lack of support from Top Management

2.3. Poor leadership

2.4. Low Moral

2.5. Lack of commitment

2.6. Hostile workers

2.7. Uninformed users

2.8. Troubled workers(afraid)

2.9. Poor transformed team

2.10. Poor Communication

2.11. Trust

2. Structure Weaknesses

3.12. Matrix structure

3.13. Absence of a project office

3.14. Poor team work

3.15. Roles and responsibilities

3. Project management Weaknesses

4.16. Poor baseline plan

4.17. Poor quality

4.18. Lack of recourse

4.19. Lack of knowledge

4.20. Lack of experience

4.21. Poor project planning monitoring and control

Threads

4. Management Threads

5.22. His new system

5.23. Do not involve end users

5.24. New system users are forced

5.25. Ownership of the system

5.26. Job loss

5.27. Vision

5.28. Retention of people

Solution

Project management Threads

5.29. Poor subject knowledge

5.30. Knowledge shearing

5.31. Pressured to perform

5.32. Quickly prepare project plan

5.33. Overload of work

5.34. Rework

5.35. Lack of supervision

Solution

Conclusion

Executive Summary

Out of the SWOT analysis it is visible that there are problems in this company with structural and behaviour issue. This lead to a lack of support and collaboration

This had led to the failure of FNB’s data consolidation project.

The people are not in line with the company’s strategy because there is a lack of proper communication. The currant business organisation structure does not support a project management office.

Possibly due to the rapid growth of the company over the past two years, policies and procedures have been left lacking in clarity to employees or merely not...