Submitted by: Submitted by maimoona
Views: 514
Words: 7866
Pages: 32
Category: Music and Cinema
Date Submitted: 03/25/2012 06:52 AM
(15 min.) CVP analysis, international cost structure differences.
| | |Variable |Variable |
| |Annual |Manufacturing |Marketing & |
|Country |Fixed |Cost |Distribution Cost |
| |Costs |per Sweater |per Sweater |
|Singapore |$ 6,500,000 |$ 8.00 |$11.00 |
|Thailand | 4,500,000 | 5.50 | 11.50 |
|United States |12,000,000 | 13.00 | 9.00 |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Thailand has the lowest breakeven point since it has both the lowest fixed costs ($4,500,000) and the lowest variable cost per unit ($17.00). Hence, for a given selling price, Thailand will always have a higher operating income (or a lower operating loss) than Singapore or the U.S.
The U.S. breakeven point is 1,200,000 units. Hence, with sales of only 800,000 units, it has an operating loss of $4,000,000.
3-27 (30 min.) Sales mix, new and upgrade customers.
1.
| |New |Upgrade |
| |Customers |Customers |
|SP |$210 |$120 |
|VCU |90 |40 |
|CMU |120 |80 |
The 60%/40% sales mix implies that, in each bundle, 3 units are sold to new customers and 2 units are sold to upgrade customers.
Contribution margin of the bundle = 3 × $120 + 2 × $80 = $360 + $160 = $520
Breakeven point in bundles = [pic]=...