Model Answer for the Energy Cooperative Case Study

|What are the ethical issues or |How can this be resolved |How can this be resolved |How can this be resolved |How can this be resolved |How would these issues be resolved a|

|concerns in this Energy Cooperative |applying KANT"s Categorical |applying MILL's Theory of |applying the theory of RIGHT's |applying the theory of JUSTICE|t each stage of KOHLBERG's Levels of|

|Case study? |Imperative? |Utilitrainism? |based of ethical decision |based ethical decision making?|Moral Development?(label the stages)|

| | | |making? | | |

|This issue presents a conflict of | If I agree to allow the | I must decide what produces| The individual members of the | Under the theory of justice, | Stage 1: Reaction to Punishment: |

|interest for the Directors. The |directors to utilize their |the greatest amount of good |board have a right to maintain |I would need to ask if it is |At stage 1, actions are based on |

|statement may give them a benefit or |affiliation with the |for the greatest number of |their individual consulting |fair to allow the directors to|wants, with the avoidance of |

|privilege that other members of the |cooperative for their own |people. Does allowing the |business; they also have a |use the name of the Energy |punishment. Since there is not |

|organization do not have. Their |personal gain for their |use of the phrase and |right to be adequately |Cooperative in order to help |anything negative for the directors |

|personal business would benefit by |business, then I must also be |neglecting the voting |compensated for time and |promote their own personal |or an...