Submitted by: Submitted by dbbland
Views: 970
Words: 838
Pages: 4
Category: Literature
Date Submitted: 05/25/2012 06:12 PM
A Theoretical Model Critique:
How to Help People Change by Jay E. Adams and
Telling Yourself the Truth by William Backus and Marie Chapian
Liberty University
A Theoretical Model Critique: Backus, Chapian, and Adams
Summary
As it relates to the theoretical construct of Dr. William Backus and Dr. Marie Chapian (1980) as compared with the work of Dr. Jay Adams (1986), it is very clear to see that their work is quite complimentary to each other. Backus et al. develops a comprehensive approach centered on the concept of Misbelief Therapy. Backus et al (1980) maintains that misbeliefs within the mind directly relates to causes of emotional turmoil, maladaptive behavior, and metal illness (p.17). As a result through their approach Backus et al seeks to engage the client in a conversation that identifies cognitive misbeliefs, with the ultimate goal of restructuring the individuals cognate state.
Adams (1986) approach utilizes a four-step nouthetic model that seeks to develop cognitive change through the working of the Holy Spirit. As a result Adams suggests that the best way to promote change within the clinical setting is to provide practical scripture based teaching concerning Gods expectation of righteous and acceptable living. Adams model maintains that once individuals are taught and informed that the Holy Spirit will work to convict the client of wrong thinking and behavior. Furthermore, Adams model seeks to move clients from teaching and conviction to correction and disciplined training. Adams (p.1986) provides support for counselors seeking to become involved in the change process, as well as provides strong clear scriptural standards to help produce Godly thinking and character (p.171).
Strength and Weaknesses
I found that both Backus et al and Adams provide models that are comparable to some secular Cognitive Behavioral models. I also enjoyed Backus et al....