Europeanization: Theory or Cultural Phenomenon?

Europeanization: Theory or Cultural Phenomenon?

Europeanization is a very complex subject, and yet has a very obscure definition. Since many definitions exist, with differing complexities there is an argument to be made for regarding Europeanization as much more than a theory. There are many definitions attributable to Europeanization depending on the context and the individual. In broad conceptual terms, Europeanization can be defined as ‘when something in the domestic political system is affected by something European.’ It can also be loosely defined as domestic change caused by European integration. Both of these definitions still leave much to contemplate and leave us to wonder what type of change Europeanization really is. Arguably, the most widely accepted definition is Radaelli’s. In his regard, Europeanization is ‘the processes of construction, diffusion and institutionalization of formal and informal rules, procedures, policy paradigms, styles, ways of doing things and shared beliefs and norms which are first defined and consolidated in the making of EU decisions and then incorporated in the logic of domestic discourse, identities, political structures and public policies.’ With regard to the impact of the EU on member states and vice-versa, there is significant evidence to suggest that a certain grouping of nations have initiated the uploading process (founding nations), whilst others have struggled to impose their influence upon the EU institutional framework. In essence, some nations have had a greater influence on EU policy and framework than others. Whilst it seems logical to assume nations that have joined much later have had far less power or influence over nations who have been involved since inception. What follows will examine the influence of smaller nations, which have joined later, compared with that of founding, traditionally ‘European’ nations, whilst attempting to determine if Europeanization is merely a theory grounded by many...