Submitted by: Submitted by bahircar
Views: 265
Words: 1039
Pages: 5
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 11/18/2012 10:22 AM
Grading Criteria - Individual Assignment
Critical Thinking in the Legal Environment: Torts and Products Liability
Objective 1: Apply models of critical thinking and systems thinking to address complex organizational issues.
Objective 4: Analyze the link between ethics and organizational effectiveness
Objective 5: Apply legal concepts in the business environment to managerial decision-making and implementation
Competencies: Critical Thinking, Information Literacy/Research Skills, Communication Skills
Assignment: Research the McDonald's and Pearson cases, and in 10-12 double-spaced pages compare and contrast the facts, law, and merits of the two lawsuits by answering the following questions. Include an introduction and conclusion in your paper.
|Criteria |Exceeds Expectations |Meets Expectations |Below Expectations |
|Assignment Questions | | | |
|1. What are the facts? |Clearly identifies and explains a majority of|Generally correct in identification of |Does not correctly identify the relevant Facts. |
| |the relevant Facts in each case. |the relevant Facts, but includes some |Important facts are missing and/or there are an |
| | |inaccuracy and/or does not explain |unacceptable number of inaccuracies. |
| | |adequately. | |
|2. What are the issues? |Clearly identifies and succinctly summarizes |Identifies some of the major issues, |Does not identify...