Submitted by: Submitted by sahmadi
Views: 269
Words: 542
Pages: 3
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 02/04/2013 08:51 AM
* 4 Tort Causes of Action for Invasion of Privacy:
1. Intrusion Upon a person’s solitude:
a. Physical or nonphysical intrusion into “zone of privacy.”
b. Must be highly offensive to a reasonable person (objective standard).
2. Public Disclosure of Private Facts About a Person:
c. Must be highly offensive to a reasonable person and not a matter of legitimate concern to the public.
3. Publicity Placing a Person in a False Light to Public:
d. Publicity attributing to a person characteristics he does not have or beliefs he does not hold.
4. Misappropriation of Name or Likeness for Commercial Purposes (also called the Right of Publicity):
e. Use of name/image/other information for commercial purposes to imply some non-existent connection or to imply product endorsement.
Defense to Defamation
*Privilege – even if all of the elements of defamation have been established by the plaintiff, the defendant will be protected by a “qualified privilege” in certain situations:
1. Statements made during “legislative proceedings.”
2. Statements made during “executive proceedings.”
3. Statements made during “judicial proceedings.”
4. Statements made as “employment references.”
5. Statements made as “credit bureau information.”
* P must prove that D made the false and defamatory statement either:
a. With knowledge of its falsity; or
b. With reckless disregard as to its truth.
* Reckless disregard – D had serious doubts as to the truth of the statement.
* Note: reckless disregard is tough to prove therefore this standard supports 1st Amendment & freedom of the press.
* P must prove only that D acted with a lack of reasonable care in making the false statement.
* Note: easier to prove and easier for P to win the lawsuit.
* Required Degree of Fault Depends on Who the Plaintiff is:
Public Official Public Figure Private Figure
The Actual Malice Standard Negligence...