Submitted by: Submitted by life2005
Views: 208
Words: 5248
Pages: 21
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 02/18/2013 06:02 AM
Privatization of Real Options
Enrico Pennings*
Erasmus University Rotterdam and Tinbergen Institute
Abstract
This paper examines the government’s sale of a real option in a simple setting without information asymmetries but with uncertainty surrounding the value of the asset. It is shown that requiring a combination of pledged investments and upfront cash payment when privatizing the option to invest generates less revenue for the government than a cash only payment. Compulsory investments in addition to the upfront payment or retained government shareholding, however, can increase the government’s revenue.
Key Words: Privatization, Real Options
JEL-Codes: P21, G13, G31, D92
* Erasmus University Rotterdam
Applied Economics H13-31
Burg. Oudlaan 50
3062PA Rotterdam, Netherlands
E-Mail: Pennings@few.eur.nl
Phone: +31 10 4082166
Fax: +31 10 4089141
1. Introduction
Privatization, the process of government divestiture of its holdings in state-owned companies, has received enormous attention by both scholars and policy makers in order to determine its effect on both individual companies and on governments (Megginson and Netter, 2001). Auctions are generally employed for the sale of a publicly held asset with unknown value for two reasons. First, it is believed that private firms can make more efficient use of an asset than a government can. Second, governments are concerned with maximizing the revenues from privatization (Lopez-de-Silanes, 1997). An auction is generally perceived as an efficient instrument to allocate a former state owned firm to the firm with the highest valuation and to extract as much revenue as possible (Schmidt and Schnitzer, 1997).[1]
Though some governments opt for gradual transitions to market economies with restructuring actions prior to privatization, almost all transition governments decide to rapidly privatize through a so-called big bang approach (Svejnar, 2002). Not only legal systems and...