Submitted by: Submitted by Jeemin
Views: 298
Words: 528
Pages: 3
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 02/24/2013 01:27 PM
a. Assess Corrigan's liquidity position and determine how it compares with peers and how the liquidity |
position has changed over time. | | | | |
Corrigan's liquidity position has improved from 2010 to 2011; however, its current ratio is still |
below the industry average of 2.7. | | | | |
| | | | | | |
b. Assess Corrigan's asset management position and determine how it compares with peers and |
how its asset management efficiency has changed over time. | | |
Corrigan's inventory turnover, fixed assets turnover, and total assets turnover have improved from |
2010 to 2011; however, they are still below industry averages. The firm's days sales outstanding ratio |
has increased from 2010 to 2011--which is bad. In 2010, its DSO was close to the industry average. |
In 2011, its DSO is somewhat higher. If the firm's credit policy has not changed, it needs to |
look at its receivables and determine whether it has any uncollectibles. If it does have uncollectible |
receivables, this will make its current ratio look worse than what was calculated above. | |
| | | | | | |
c. Assess Corrigan's debt management position and determine how it compares with peers and how its |
debt management has changed over time. | | | | |
Corrigan's debt ratio has increased from 2010 to 2011, which is bad. In 2010, its debt ratio was right |
at the industry average, but in 2011 it is higher than the industry average. Given its weak current and |
asset management ratios, the firm should strengthen its balance sheet by paying down liabilities. |
|
f. Calculate Corrigan's ROE as well as the industry average ROE using the DuPont equation. |
From this analysis, how does Corrigan's financial position compare with the industry | |
average numbers? | | | | | |
| ROE = | PM x | TA Turnover x Equity Multiplier | |
2011 | 2.22% | 0.43% | 2.31 |...