Submitted by: Submitted by aelder
Views: 207
Words: 16991
Pages: 68
Category: Other Topics
Date Submitted: 03/23/2013 08:09 AM
Criminal Law Outline
Professor Haque
Power to Criminalize and Punish
* Utilitarian: Humans act rationally and will avoid criminal activity if the perceived potential pain (punishment) outweighs the expected potential pleasure (criminal rewards)
* Forward looking
1) Punishment serves deterrence by incapacitation and intimidation
2) Punishment may reform/rehabilitate the wrongdoer
3) Different forms:
A. General deterrence – An individual D is punished in order to convince the general community to forego criminal conduct in the future.
B. Individual deterrence – D’s punishment is meant to deter future misconduct by D (accomplished by incapacitation or intimidation).
C. Rehabilitation / Reform – Although goal is the same - to reduce future crime – advocates of this model think that punishment may help to reform D so his wish to commit crimes will be lessened.
* Retributivism: Punishment is justified when it is deserved. Expression of societal outrage.
* Backward looking
1) It is morally right to hate criminals
2) Punishment is a means of securing a moral balance in society: criminal enjoyed benefits of system rules without accepting the burden – and owes a debt
3) Different forms:
A. Assaultive Retribution – B/c criminal has harmed society, it is right for society to “hurt him back”; treat criminals like noxious insects.
B. Protective Retribution – Punishment is a means of securing a moral balance in society; criminals themselves have a right to be punished / a right to be treated as a responsible moral agent.
C. Victim Vindication – Punishment reaffirms the victim’s worth as a human being in the face of the criminal’s challenge; represents a “defeat of the wrongdoer.”
* Difference between Utilitarianism & Retributivism
* R looks backwards and justifies punishment only on the...