Respondent

SEEDLING SCHOOL OF LAW AND GOVERENCE

IN THE HON’BLE

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

GANESH RAJ SINGH CHAUHAN AND KRISHNA RAJ SINGH CHAUHAN (Appellant)

Vs.

VIJAY LAXMI CHAUHAN

(Respondent)

Written Memorial Submitted on the behalf of RESPONDENT

Submitted To - Mr. Dinesh Babu Submitted By – Digvijay Singh

VI SEM

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 2

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES 2

Cases are as follows 2

Books:- 3

Websites:- 3

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION 3

SYNOPSIS OF FACTS 4

ARGUMENTS ADVANCED 8

PRAYER 11

INDEX OF AUTHORITIES

Cases are as follows

Maturi vs. Maturi AIR 1966 SC 1836

Pokhar Singh v. Mt. Dulari Kunwar, AIR 1930 Allahabad 687

Raj Gopal v. S.Vanket AIR1947 PC122

Sugalabai vs Gundappa A. Maradi And Ors. on 18 September, 2007

Books:-

(1.) HINDU SECCESSION ACT 1956

(2.) CONISTITUTION OF INDIA (P.M.Bakshi)

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION

In the instant case, the Supreme Court of India has no jurisdiction to hear this case under Article 134A which says that Certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court. Every High Court has been passed the certificate of appeal or making a judgment, decree, final order or sentence to the Supreme Court of India[1]. In the mention case, the High Court has not passed the certificate to the Supreme Court.

Therefore, the appellant has not approach to the Supreme Court of India.

SYNOPSIS OF FACTS

Dev Raj Singh Chauhan was the karta of Hindu Joint Family consisting of his wife Divya Singh Chauhan two sons Ganesh Raj Singh Chauhan and Krishna Raj Singh Chauhan and an unmarried daughter Vijay Laxmi Chauhan. Dev Raj Singh Chauhan had extensive ancestral immovable and movable properties in the state of Rajasthan . This included an...