Case Study

Resolution with Reason

May 4, 2013

Introduction:

As a psychologist you at some point in time will be faced with situations that may be considered a sort of ethical dilemma. As a professional, when you come across these situations, you will find yourself referring to the Ethical Principals of Psychologist and the Code of Conduct. This paper will review an ethical dilemma that a psychologist has come across, the path taken and the decision that was made by the psychologist.

The Dilemma:

This psychologist is treating a minor child for depression and minor cutting. The child's parents are divorced, and you obtained consent to treat the child from the father, the custodial parent. The mother (noncustodial parent) has called and wants to be involved in her son's treatment. The father was very adamant on not wanting the mother involved; he divorced her because of her drinking and she continues to drink.

The Decision:

Due to the fact that the minor child has just recently started treatment and taking into considering the relationship between the father and mother, the psychologist has temporarily decided to deny the mothers request. The psychologist believes that it is best at the moment to allow the child to open up on his own and feel comfortable being able to talk. The child needs to gain trust in this psychologist and see that she will not hurt him. At a later date this psychologist will speak with the child regarding the feelings he may have allowing the mother to be a part of treatment. Only then at that point will the psychologist set a meeting with the father and mother and see if it will be possible for all parties involved to come to an agreement. At that point if and when an agreement is made, the psychologist will inform the mother that on certain days and times she will be allowed to participate in the child’s treatment. The psychologist will communicate any information regarding progress and or concerns per the child and the father ("APA Ethics...