Submitted by: Submitted by sherrytseng
Views: 208
Words: 2101
Pages: 9
Category: Business and Industry
Date Submitted: 06/11/2013 11:40 AM
Reading 6.1 “Moral obligations of sales people”
Carson: the ethics of sales
Four moral duties:
Different kinds of salesperson have different kinds of duties to their customers
* Golden rule= most plausible construed as a consistency principle
* Sales should driven by golden rule
Criticism and Extend David Holley theory: provide more plausible theory based on mutual rational consent
Critics on Holley: fully informed duty
Purpose 6 moral duties
* Fully answer questions
* Provide buyers with safety warnings
* Refrain from lying and deception
Sales should driven by golden rule
Provide the modified version of David Holley’s view, who oppose caveat emptor
Kantian perspective: deception and lying are both immoral
Reading 6.2 Phillips “manipulative advertising”
Advertising manipulate our needs and fears
Four possible attacks
1. Manipulative advertising has negative consequences for utility
2. Undermines personal autonomy
3. Violates kant’s categorical imperative (respect to person version)
4. Weakens the personal virtue
Critic:
No complete definite basis for condemning it.
What is manipulative advertising?
1. By socializing them to embrace consumerist values
2. By dictating individual purchase decisions.
Associative advertising: associating product with a nonmarket good. Influence consumer perceptions (Using linkage
Provide criticism from utilitarianism, Kant autonomy, and virtue ethics perspective
Utilitarianism:
1) Generate little additional utility, and deny autonomy ( Dependency effect creates desire)
2) Power to distort consumer choices among brands and products
Socialize life of consumption
It do not yield ult
Use Levitt’s argument and phil himself tend to agree with Levitt’s view
* Consumers are aware of ad illusion
* Consumers want and need to be manipulated. (life is boring)
* People gain utility by accepting ad illusions
Autonomy:
Little utility is generated when we...