U01D1

Briefly summarize the history of the mind-brain problem and argue for the validity of either the monist's theories or dualist's theories. Although your text provides some information, additional materials will be necessary to craft a careful argument. You may wish to consult texts from other disciplines, including philosophy and economics to support your assigned position.

The mind-brain problem questions whether the mind is no more than a side-effect of our brain processes or whether the mind can, in some degree, influence behavior.

Two conceptual approaches to the mind-body problem have been prevalent throughout history. One view sees man as split into two or more divisions, while the other sees man as a basic unity. Dualism proposes that the body and mind function separately and that the mind influences the body. The monistic model does not agree with splitting man into parts and views him as one organism. It proposes that the body and mind are all one and act together accordingly.

On the other hand, biologist believe that the brain will eventually be found in the mind. They state that through scientific research, the brain with its cells, structures, and neural connections will eventually identify the mind (McLeod, 2007).

I have leaned towards the dualist’s theory. I believe that the body and mind are separate. For instance, people with Alzheimer’s may not be there in mind, but their body still function and carry on, even though the mind does not.

There was recent research from cognitive psychologists that has changed the views on this debate. Using computer analogy of Artificial Intelligence, they applied it to this debate. They stated that the brain can be compared to computer hardware that is wired or connected to the human body. The mind can be identified as software, allowing different software programs to run (McLeod, 2007).