Proposal on Death Penalty

A Proposal on Death Penalty

Shalisa Brown, Miranda Bullington, Kveta Dalton, Theo Golden, Lennise Jakes

CJA/334

November 06, 2012

Garry Moore

A Proposal on Death Penalty

We as team contest against the death penalty. We are not knowledgeable on the regulations or the comprehensive history of the death penalty, since this is not a concern where knowledge is essential. We sense the way we do are perhaps common purpose, but for reasons that might be less shared. We are not assassins, we do not hunt, while we are not disparate to others hunting. We have no yearning to murder anyone, nor be a party to doing such an item. This doesn’t unkind mean that we are pacifist. We just do not feel that death penalty hold up in court reason because the inmates just sitting in jail over years.

We would not pause, not even for a second to try to protect our self or someone else, even to the point of murder the attacker if that be the only way to stop an attack that could cause serious harm. Nevertheless, this is not the same as wanting to end somebody’s life cold-bloodedly and premeditated, as done in an execution. Within this proposal there will be many question and answers why we are against the death penalty.

The general area being studied would be the length of time an inmate spend on death row the cost of housing the inmate and how the execution is carry out. The most important issues would be the government is they into the death professional. We would like our taxes to go in the direction of forming an anonymous agency that will deal with convicts on death row. Many people probably a solid majority support the death penalty (Clark, 1997).

This area is important to study because with the death penalty more inmates are sitting on death roll waiting to be executed. Could the death penalty aids as a reasonable and valid form of punishment. The eighth amendment stated that United States cannot use “cruel and unusual” retribution. The facts that punishment is a legal...