Lockheed Tristar Capital Budget

Related Essays

Capital Budgeting
This page intentionally left blank Capital Budgeting This book explains the nancial appraisal of capital budgeting projects. The coverage extends from the
Capital Budgeting- Air India
I HAVE COMPLETED THIS PROJECT ON CAPITAL BUDGETING IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2010- ... London via Cairo and Geneva with a Lockheed Constellation aircraft. In early 1950s
Capital Budgeting
present value, and internal rate of return(Gallagher, 2003). The simplest capital budgeting method is the payback method. The analyst must calculate the number
Capital Budgeting
private entities employ multiple budgets: capital budgets, operating budgets, and cash budgets. Private-sector capital budgeting is concerned only with decisions

Submitted by to the category Business and Industry on 09/27/2011 04:18 PM

Lockheed Tri Star and Capital Budgeting—Case Analysis

Executive Summary

Introduction/Motivation

Capital investment decisions are long term finance decisions designed to strategically invest in projects that will improve the value of the corporation for stockholders. There are several methods for determining which projects are worth investing in, but the best methods must take into account the net present value of the future cash flows resulting from the investment using an appropriate discount rate for the project and managements assessment of the risk involved. In the Lockheed case which we will examine in detail below, the management made a decision to proceed with the Tri Star project based on a break even analysis. As we will show, their analysis was flawed, failing to take into account the net present value of their investments resulting in a huge loss of value for the company.

Data/Analysis Section

In breaking out the data as referenced in the Harvard Business case study from the Lockheed Tri-Star situation, organizing the cash flows in a spreadsheet depiction offered the most clarity in analyzing the information.

As seen above, @ 210 aircraft produced over the above time perior, the $900mm in up front costs are spread over the first 5 years (1967-1971), annual unit production costs of $490mm are spread over 6 years (1971-1976), and revenues are divided up in both 25% deposits ($140mm/yr from 1970-1975) and the balance of those revenues ($420mm/yr from 1972-1977).

In analyzing the cash flows @ 210 aircraft for those 10 years keeping in mind the 10% assumed cost of capital to Lockheed, the NPV of the project was -$530,950,000; the IRR of the project was -9%, and the project lost $480,000,000 when netting the costs of the project with the revenues.

In the scenario where production is assumed @ 300 aircraft for that time period, the $900mm in upfront costs remains over the first 6 years, however unit production costs...

View Full Essay
Full Essay Stats...
  • Words: 886
  • Pages: 4
  • Views: 887

Join now to view this essay and thousands of others on PaperCamp.com. It's free Join Now!